Impeachment of President Trump
Throughout the case supporting the impeachment of the President, it describes Donald Trump engaging with foreign countries and power being "corrupt." In other words, saying that the power Trump holds uses it irresponsibly and unfairly. Trump was suspected of asking other countries for help and investigating his opponents. This helps understand how this is causing an impeachment hearing. Trumps personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, was told by Trump to help him by leading an investigation on Ukraine. This shows another example of why there would be supporters in favor of the impeachment. It is shown to be wrong to take advantage of the power he has and to use it selfishly. It is being said that the White House is forbidding people to assist with justifying Trumps wrongdoings. This shows how there are corrupt people working under the White House. On the other side of the argument, against the impeachment, it is explained that Trumps tweet argues that his "due process" rights were being taken for granted. In other words they keep picking on him. But, why would he try to argue this statement if what the problem is being focussed on is him if the people have a reason to do so? Also, it is being argued that it doesn't say how far the President could go on the use of his powers. To sum it up, from both sides of the argument, in favor and against the impeachment, we could see how both uses language to describe specific things and people in either a positive or negative way. Leaving readers point of views to change or to question their thoughts. Also, leaving readers to notice things that seemed to be hidden and are now truly revealed by two different sides.
Comments
Post a Comment